Amel Alghrani, Paula Case, John Fanning, Editorial: The Mental Capacity Act 2005—Ten Years On, Medical Law Review, Volume 24, Issue 3, August 2016, Pages 311–317, https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fww032. We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. These considerations, he says, are implicitly relevant for the purposes of the DOLS’ best interests and eligibility requirements and retain a degree of paternalism in the decision-making process. Critiquing The ‘Balance Sheet’ Approach to Best Interests Decision-Making, Lack of Capacity is not an ‘off Switch’ for Rights and Freedoms: Wye Valley Nhs Trust V Mr B (By His Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor) [2015] Ewcop 60, A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Buccal Mucosal Graft Harvest Site Non-Closure. In 2007, Parliament introduced the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS), a new legal framework designed to close the so-called ‘Bournewood’ gap.15 Tagged onto the MCA through the Mental Health Act 2007, the DOLS have proved to be a controversial innovation. The Role of CCGs 4 5. <]>>
11 What Williams refers to as ‘the concertina effect’: V Williams and others, Making Best Interest Decisions: People and Processes (Mental Health Organisation 2012) 3.2. According Appropriate Weight to Children’s Wishes and Feelings: RESPONSIBLE PRACTICE OR RESTRICTED PRACTICE? There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Mental Capacity Act 2005, Section 44. The Committee will report in March 2014. Described as a ‘visionary piece of legislation’, the MCA was a significant landmark on the legal landscape.1 It represented a triumph of autonomy by recognising that, as far as possible, people should play an active role in decisions about their welfare. There is a risk that the application of the statutory criteria for incapacity is sometimes obscured by the non-statutory, clinical terminology of ‘insight’ used by expert witnesses in CoP proceedings. Mental Capacity Act 2005. Why the MCA is important to CCGs 4 4. Mental Capacity Act 2005 - summary Introduction The Mental Capacity Act 2005 provides a statutory framework to empower and protect vulnerable people who are not able to make their own decisions. Parity between patients judged to have capacity and those assessed as not having capacity would certainly bring the MCA jurisprudence closer to the values of the UNCRPD. A number of its provisions indirectly challenge the orthodoxy of the MCA (an issue which also features in Allen, Bartlett, and Ruck Keene’s paper) and soon, serious questions were being asked about the compatibility of the MCA with UNCRPD values and requirements. Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Cheshire West and Cheshire Council v P,16 there has been an explosion in number of applications for DOLS ‘standard authorisations’ in England, adding further strain to an already-creaking system.17 Since they first came into effect in 2009, calls to reform the DOLS have grown in volume. 0000001611 00000 n
As it enters its difficult teenage years, the MCA faces new challenges, not least the continuing instalments in the Cheshire West story, including the CoP’s efforts to introduce streamlined procedures for non-contentious deprivation of liberty applications.26 But whatever its imperfections, and whatever difficulties are faced by those who must apply it, the significant advances of the MCA and the still evolving CoP jurisprudence should not be lost on us. 17 See Health & Social Care Information Centre, Mental Capacity Act (2005): Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (England) Annual Report 2014-15 (29 September 2015)
Baglama Vs Bouzouki, Gmod Anakin Skywalker, Private Cook Jobs Near Me, Mercer Island High School Student Store, Which Of The Following Are Problems Associated With Landfills, Travis County Esd 2 Map, Bridgewater, Ma Zip Code, Hub International Revenue 2020, Pole Dancer Chat Up Lines,